http://www.kslegislature.org/li/b2011_12/year1/measures/hb2099/
HB 2099 is for the creation of the "Kansas Goat Council" and a proposed check off fee for every goat sold in Kansas under possible penalty of legal action, fines or imprisonment.
From Bill:
(2) "Any person who unreasonably fails or refuses to pay any assessments due under this act may be subject to legal action by the Council to recover the assessments due, plus interests and costs."
AND
"(e) Any person who violates any provision of this section shall be
guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be subject to a
fine of not less than $25 nor more than $500, or to imprisonment for not
less than 30 nor more than 90 days, or by both such fine and
imprisonment.
It is true that if a goat is sold through an auction facility or slaughter house the record keeping may not be as burdensome because the facility will likely deduct the check off fee, proposed in this new Kansas law at that time but it will be different for those who sell breeding stock and person to person sales. It will increase paperwork and force breeders to disclose their customer information. (This is a business for many people and that information should be considered proprietary and confidential.)
Of course there will always be that person that says "Well it is only 50 cents per goat sold, is that going to break you?" No, of course not, but the point is we need less government and regulations in our lives, not more. I also think it is wrong that this goat check-off was proposed and created by ONE single goat association, "The Kansas Meat Goat Association" with no input from other goat clubs, associations or long time breeders outside of the KMGA and no input from dairy goat producers before hand. It is particularly unfair to dairy goat breeders who will help support this check-off with fees for every goat they sell but nothing in return as this is a check-off to promote meat goats in the state of Kansas.
Do I think the promotion of meat goats (and dairy goats and their products too which this bill won't do) in Kansas is a good thing? Absolutely, and in theory if written properly and with the input off ALL kansas goat producers a goat check-off could be a good thing, BUT this is a bad bill the way it is written in my opinion and needs to be tabled at least or stopped so it could be looked at further and discussed with the knowledge and participation of all goat producers in KS, not just the board of the KMGA. I have never personally been a member of the KMGA as one only has to talk to past members or go to their website and read their meeting minutes to get a hint of the strife and disagreements with-in the association.
More from this Bill:
"Section 1. (a) There is hereby created the Kansas goat council.
5 (1) The council shall consist of seven members who shall be elected at the annual meeting of the Kansas meat goat association. The board of directors of the Kansas meat goat association shall act as interim council members until council members can be elected and qualified. Vacancies which may occur shall be filled for unexpired terms by the board of directors of the Kansas meat goat association from among the producers of the state."
The following information was posted on a goat yahoo group and I am passing it on for those that would like to contact the commitee members or testify before the committee tomorrow.
------------------------------------------------------------------
House Bill 2099 – Creation of the Kansas Goat Council – will be heard in the House Agriculture & Natural Resources Committee on February 8, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. in Room 783 in the Docking State Office Building.
If you would like to testify before the committee, please call Kay Scarlett, Committee Assistant, at 785-296-7694. Please provide 35 copies of your written testimony by 8:30 a.m. the day of the meeting.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Larry Powell, larry.powell@house.ks.gov
Dan Kerschen, dan.kerschen@house.ks.gov
Mike Peterson, mike.peterson@house.ks.gov
Bob Grant, bob.grant@house.ks.gov
Jerry Williams, jerry.williams@house.ks.gov
Ponka-We Victors, ponka-we.victors@house.ks.gov
Vince Wetta, vince.wetta@house.ks.gov
Caryn Tyson, caryn.tyson@house.ks.gov
Willie Prescott, willie.prescott@house.ks.gov
Charlotte O'Hara, charlotte.ohara@house.ks.gov
Tom Moxley, tom.moxley@house.ks.gov
Kyle Hoffman , kyle.hoffman@house.ks.gov
Brett Hildabrand, brett.hildabrand@house.ks.gov
Gary Hayzlett , gary.hayzlett@house.ks.gov
Rocky Fund, rocky.fund@house.ks.gov
Dan Collins, dan.collins@house.ks.gov
Bob Brookens, bob.brookens@house.ks.gov
Elaine Bowers, elaine.bowers@house.ks.gov
Tom Arpke, tom.arpke@house.ks.gov
3 comments:
My first thought upon reading this was, the government needs to stay out of the goat business. As you mentioned, it's just the beginning, once the bill if passed...the fee's could climb. I hope that this bill does not pass, as I said, government needs to stay out. Thanks for sharing this, interesting.
Wow, is all I have to say!
Amy
We hope the bill is not passed. It should be clearly discussed by all stakeholders rather than just have something like this slip through arbitrarily.
Mocha Barney, Ashley Pumpernickel and Winniechurchill
Post a Comment